1: capable of being sustained
1: capable of being sustained
The Climate Change talks opened in Durban, South Africa this morning, as Jacob Zuma of South Africa offered a wise word of advice: “Change and solutions are always possible. In these talks, states, parties, will need to look behind their national interests to find a solution for the common good and human benefit.”
Zuma has high hopes for the conference and the potential changes that can take place once these talks close. One debate topic of the Climate Change Conference this year is the Kyoto Protocol that I touched on briefly yesterday.
The United Nations defines the Kyoto Protocol as such…
“The Kyoto Protocol is an international agreement linked to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The major feature of the Kyoto Protocol is that it sets binding targets for 37 industrialized countries and the European community for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions .These amount to an average of five per cent against 1990 levels over the five-year period 2008-2012.
The major distinction between the Protocol and the Convention is that while the Convention encouraged industrialised countries to stabilize GHG emissions, the Protocol commits them to do so.”
(You can find all the information from the United Nations right here.)
If the biggest two emitters (the US and China) don’t ratify the Kyoto Protocol, it may be a lost cause. It seems a little unjust since the emissions caused by the most developed countries are causing floods and droughts in developing countries across the globe. As the talks continue, it is my hope that leaders like Zuma take a strong stand for the Protocol and that all the nations involved will reassess the importance of renewing national emissions goals. Like Zuma said, it will be impossible to effect change globally if all nations do not work together for the good of every single one of the 7 billion.
We’ve got two weeks of Climate Change talks to change the world. Here we go.
In the words of great South African activist Nelson Mandela, “It always seems impossible until it is done.”
Thanksgiving is definitely a hectic time of year for the grocery store community. I was surprised to see that Kroger was open all night, even on Thanksgiving Day, for all those last minute details for the perfect Thanksgiving feast. The average person consumes around 3000 calories on Thanksgiving, and 12 million turkeys are sold by Butterball alone every year, the majority sold around Thanksgiving. That’s not to mention how much pumpkin, stuffing, and cranberries. I cannot even imagine the infrastructure needed to supply that much food to grocery stores around the country. Thanksgiving, for most Americans, is the opposite of sustainable in the way of food sourcing.
I was happily surprised to find out that my cousin had purchased a local turkey from a farm in East Tennessee that he’d had shipped to a local market. He also contributed some delicious local purple potatoes and sweet potatoes. While we obviously weren’t able to feed our whole family solely on food from our backyard, I felt better about our excessive feast knowing that some of it was supplied locally. There are ways to be sustainable, even in the Holiday seasons like Thanksgiving and Christmas. Buy meat from local distributors, get your friends gifts from small vendors, or better yet, make them. (Confession: I’m a crocheter.) The Holidays are an especially important time to pay attention to sustainability, both in food and energy.
Here are some other fun facts about Thanksgiving
3,000: Calories are consumed by the average person at Thanksgiving dinner.
12: Million turkeys are sold by Butterball each year.
675: Million pounds of turkey are consumed each year.
50: Million pumpkin pies are eaten at Thanksgiving.
350: Approximate number of pounds the largest pumpkin pie ever made weighed. It used 80 pounds of cooked pumpkin, 36 pounds of sugar, 12 dozen eggs, measured 5 feet in diameter and took six hours to bake.
40: How many million green bean casseroles are made.
100: Age of some of the oldest cranberry beds—and they’re still producing!
72: Millions of can of Ocean Spray Cranberry Sauce purchased each year.
565: Number of times a line of all the cranberries produced in the U.S. would stretch from Boston to Los Angeles if you lined them all up, end to end.
Or find them here
An issue was brought up by a fellow classmate of mine this past week regarding a lack of food donation by massive food distribution companies, like the ones seen in our campus dining halls. The obvious reason for avoiding food donation of leftovers the risk of potential injury and lawsuit. However, my classmate brought to my attention a very interesting law commonly referred to as “The Good Samaritan Law.”
“The Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act promotes food recovery by limiting the liability of donors to instances of gross negligence or intentional misconduct. The Act further states that, absent gross negligence or intentional misconduct, persons, gleaners, and nonprofit organizations shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability arising from the nature, age, packaging, or condition of apparently wholesome food or apparently fit grocery products received as donations.”
This piece of legislation is absolutely necessary for the transport and donation of food that can supply thousands of soup kitchens and other non-profit food organizations. It is important that excess food be either composted or donated, but the latter is certainly more beneficial to society as a whole.
I hope that the university and other institutions take this piece of legislation and run with it, as it would benefit all parties involved.
For more information on this bill see:
The USDA’s “A Citizen’s Guide to Food Recovery”
or his EPA article “Feed People– Not Landfills”
To those who partake in the world of sustainable research and living, I think there has been a consensus that while big ideas and drastic changes make the fastest and most progressive achievements, they are not the only way. Small, simple ideas that can be implemented in thousands of individual homes or communities are gaining credibility.
Let’s be honest. We can’t all have solar panels on the patios of our one-room apartments, and we can’t all afford to send our current gas guzzling cars to the recycling center and invest in a brand new Prius or Leaf. We certainly can’t grow and produce enough food to feed our families on top of white-collar, 40 hour per week jobs in the city.
I think this feeling of powerlessness is what keeps your average Joe from attempting sustainability and taking on the task of saving the world. But this is a misconception. While we certainly aren’t all white-coat scientists, each member of society can take some simple steps to become more sustainable.
Here are some simple, pragmatic, and yet highly effective home-based solutions to sustainability.
There are many simple ways to save the environment, but it will take a whole movement of people participating. You don’t have to sell your car in turn for an electric one; just drive less. It’s the social responsibility of every member of a community to commit to sustainable living. In so many cases, it is cheaper, easier, and healthier to live by green standards; why wouldn’t you?
On my way to Asheville, North Carolina today, I looked over on the side of the interstate to see mile after mile of fields. However, one took me by surprise. It wasn’t full of cattle or hay, but rows and rows of shining metallic solar panels. These so-called solar farms and scattered across the country, producing comparatively small amounts of energy to power little businesses and communities.
Something very alluring, at least aesthetically, about solar energy is its infinite nature. The sunlight is producing absolutely massive amounts of energy: the energy is there, we just have to develop technology and infrastructure to harness it. We don’t have to go looking for deeply buried reserves of solar energy, it is abundant, free, carbon-neutral, and unlimited. We couldn’t ever use all the energy the sun is emitting.
Additionally, new advances like 360 degree panels are reshaping the way we harvest solar energy: making it more efficient, and therefore more affordable. Mirrors can also be used to reflect more light during different parts of the day onto solar panels to collect photons. Scientists are hard at work making panels more efficient (currently the best panels are still only 20% efficient) and more affordable. Some solar power is even created by using mirrors to make steam from water. Photovoltaic energy is difficult to capture, but worth the effort and money.
There is currently a lot of debate surrounding the anticipated Keystone XL pipeline, planned to stretch from Alberta, Canada to the Gulf Coast, a length of nearly 2,000 miles. In DC, investigations are underway to respond to discrepancies in “improper pressures on policy makers and possible conflicts of interest,” according to this New York Times post. On top of the recent Occupy protests, activists took to the streets in DC to make congress aware of the environmental impacts involved in the Keystone XL pipeline. Tar sands excavation for crude oil is a destructive process that emits an excessive amount of GHGs into the atmosphere. It takes two tons of tar sands to produce one barrel of crude oil. The techniques used to excavate tar sands are detrimental to the landscape and the ecosystems located there.
The government is struggling between the interests of the environment and the interests of the people, as seems to be the case quite often. The 2,000 mile pipeline would create thousands of jobs in the United States, in rural areas of the Midwest that desperately need them. But are those benefits worth the negative environmental impacts? You can read some of the debate between these two interests here.
While no definite timeline or conclusion has been set on the pipeline, we expect to hear a statement regarding plans for the Keystone XL in the coming days. Politics has a strong grip on the environmental movement, and this is yet another example of that control.